Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
realestatebusiness logo
Home of the REB Top 100 Agents

$10,000 cash limit set to impact property transactions, sales agents

By Adam Zuchetti
22 August 2019 | 7 minute read
cash australian dollar reb

The days of agents being left to manually count cash deposits — and secure them over the weekend after a Saturday auction — could soon be over, with the government pushing to introduce a $10,000 limit on all cash payments by or to businesses.

While such instances in real estate are not overly common, particularly in the modern day, they are not unheard of. Then there is the initial deposit before a cooling-off period as well as large bond payments and other requirements.

First making the announcement in the federal budget last year, the government has just finished public consultation on plans to make it a criminal offence for businesses to make or accept a cash payment of $10,000 or more.

==
==

Demonstrating its commitment to the change, it also wants to introduce penalties of up to two years’ imprisonment and a $25,200 fine for non-compliance.

The measure, set to come into effect in just over four months from 1 January 2020, comes as a result of the final report of the Black Economy Taskforce, which recommended that the government introduce such a measure to tackle tax evasion and other criminal activities.

The government is set to consider feedback received during the consultation before introducing the legislation to Parliament.

Accountants divided on restricting legal tender

Accountants, however, are divided on the issue and whether it will stamp out unwanted behaviour.

CPA Australia head of policy and advocacy, Dr Gary Pflugrath, has called for the proposed bill to be withdrawn, criticising the intention to criminalise the use of legal tender, and noting the broad impact it will have on many Australians.

“This legislation is attempting to deal with a symptom, not the cause, of the black economy. While the use of cash in a large transaction may be an indicator of risk, it does not prove by itself that the behaviour is criminal,” said Dr Pflugrath in his submission to Treasury.

“The presumption that only tax evaders, money launderers and criminals use cash, and the mindset that these new offences are required to address criminality, has resulted in a proposed bill and instrument that run counter to well-established criminal law principles and have the potential to affect many Australians.

“We believe the policy intent behind this bill would best be achieved by a mix of administrative penalties for breaches and incentives for business to move to electronic payment options. The focus on criminalising certain cash transactions is an extreme response to the problem of avoiding scrutiny.”

Extend it to all payments

On the flipside, Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand believes the measure should be extended to all payments, not just payments made to or by businesses.

Tax leader Michael Croker also believes that the $10,000 limit is too high and should be reduced in the future.

He argues that having an economy-wide cash payment limit will help reduce red tape by applying the same rule to everyone, making it easier to understand and enforce, and will make it harder for black economy participants to convert their cash to other assets through consumer-to-consumer transactions as well as consumer-to-business or business-to-consumer.

Likewise, the Institute of Public Accountants supports the measure, with Tony Greco noting the record-high number of high-denomination bank notes in circulation, suggesting that cash is being used to facilitate black economy behaviour.

Other jurisdictions

Several countries in the European Union currently have restrictions on cash payments, with France imposing a €1,000 limit, Spain with €2,500 and Italy with €2,999.99.

However, the penalties are usually reserved to a percentage range of the transaction amount or a flat fine.

CPA Australia’s Dr Pflugrath believes the proposed legislation is far more punitive than other jurisdictions and that administrative penalties should be considered instead.

“The severity of the penalties contained in the proposed offences is disproportionate to the behaviour and highly concerning,” Dr Pflugrath said.

“In effect, an individual can be audited and even if their tax liability is reported correctly, detection of a business-to-business cash transaction above $10,000 (including outside Australia where it may be the only way to make that transaction) means they can be prosecuted, receive a criminal conviction and fines of up to $12,600 for strict liability offences or $25,200 and a two-year jail sentence for indictable offences.

“Further, the deterrence effect of cash limits is not yet proven, despite a number of jurisdictions implementing similar laws albeit in the civil, rather than criminal, sphere.”

You are not authorised to post comments.

Comments will undergo moderation before they get published.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Do you have an industry update?